quinta-feira, 28 de março de 2019

The best gaming PC 2019: 10 of the top gaming desktops you can buy

a person standing in front of a television: techradar.com image © Courtesy of techradar.com techradar.com image

There are so many great PC games coming out this year, from frantic shooters like Doom Eternal to story-rich RPGs like the Outer Worlds. Plus, there are already a ton of great 2019 PC games like Devil May Cry V and The Division 2. So, if you want to prepare yourself for the onslaught of awesome games, you should arm yourself with one of the best gaming PCs. No matter which games are on your personal list, having the best gaming PC will make your experience so much better. 

It doesn't matter whether you prefer Intel, AMD or Nvidia – most PC makers will let you choose the best processors and best graphics card for your needs anyway. And, now there are Nvidia Turing graphics cards, the best gaming PCs are about to get even better looking. 

That's why we found the best gaming PCs you can buy today, from popular manufacturers like Alienware to more exotic brands like Origin. We put all of these computers through rigorous testing to make sure only the best survive. These are the 10 best gaming PCs on the market, and they will all demolish any PC game you throw at them.

a desktop computer monitor sitting on top of a desk © Provided by Future Publishing Ltd.

The Corsair One has been among the best gaming PCs ever since its debut a few years ago, and the Corsair One i160 takes things to a whole new level with Nvidia Turing graphics and Intel Coffee Lake Refresh processors. With this gaming PC, you'll be able to tackle 4K gaming on a machine that's not much larger than your average gaming console. It is expensive though – that much power kind of has to be – but it may be worth it if you're looking for a small form factor machine without compromises.

Read the full review: Corsair One i160 

© Provided by Future Publishing Ltd.

This isn't your everyday pre-built gaming PC. The Alienware Aurora R7 feat of engineering in that it packs full-sized PC parts into chassis much smaller than your traditional mid-tower rig. At the same time it's easily upgradeable and attractive to look at. All of which we would expect considering its extremely high price tag. Luckily, the Alienware Aurora R7 is both of these things and will impress those not ready or willing to build their own gaming PC.

Read the full review: Alienware Aurora R7

  • This product is only available in the US and UK at the time of this writing. Australian readers: check out a fine alternative in the MSI Aegis 3 
  • a desktop computer sitting on top of a wooden table © Provided by Future Publishing Ltd.

    It's not uncommon anymore for PC makers to brandish their pre-built desktop rigs as VR-ready. What is unusual is to do so with a computer that's also ready to conquer any game you throw at it at well over 60 frames per second and for under two grand. That's exactly what MSI has accomplished with the Infinite A, a tower whose graphical efforts aren't thwarted by its preparedness for VR, nor is it so expensive that it would see your head turn the other way.

    Read the full review: MSI Infinite A

  • This product is only available in the US at the time of this writing. Australian and UK readers: check out a fine alternative in the Overclockers 8Pack Asteroid 
  • a close up of electronics © Provided by Future Publishing Ltd.

    If you're on the market for the best gaming PC under $1,000, the Intel Hades Canyon NUC is for you. This tiny gaming PC isn't just cost-effective, but it takes up little to no space, looking more like a set-top box than a gaming PC. Don't let its size fool you, though – it packs all the power of the best gaming laptops, with an 8th-generation Intel Core i7 processor and discrete AMD Radeon graphics. You'll have to supply your own RAM, storage and OS, but if you have extra PC hardware lying around, you can save even more money.

    Read the full review: Intel Hades Canyon NUC 

    a desktop computer sitting on top of a table © Provided by Future Publishing Ltd.

    Positioned as a 'console killer,' the MSI Trident 3 looks a lot like an Xbox One S and is more powerful than a PS4 Pro, but at the end of the day, it's a PC that feels just right in your living room. Complete with all the ports you could ever dream of, the MSI Trident 3's advantages are clear. Still, in trying to be as thin and light as possible, the MSI Trident 3 comes equipped with a 330W external power supply brick, resembling some of the most less attractive console designs.

    Read the full review: MSI Trident 3

    © Provided by Future Publishing Ltd.

    If you're buying a pre-built PC, upgrades should be simple, right? That's the philosophy behind the Lenovo IdeaCentre Y900. Embellished with red lights all over, the front of its chassis is bespeckled with textured patterns that'll no doubt make your friends jealous. On top of offering support for a VR-ready GTX 1080, the Lenovo IdeaCentre boasts SLI support and room for up to 64GB of RAM, which are thankfully complemented by a convenient tool-less design.

    Read the full review: Lenovo IdeaCentre Y900

  • This product is only available in the US and UK as of this writing. Australian readers: check out a fine alternative in the Corsair One.
  • a desktop computer sitting on top of a laptop © Provided by Future Publishing Ltd.

    Much like the sublime Dell XPS 13, the Dell XPS Tower is a lesson in packing beefy specs into a svelte chassis. This inconspicuous gaming machine looks a lot like the computer that's been collecting dust in your dad's office, rather than something powering the latest PC games. But, beneath that quiet exterior, the Dell XPS Tower is one of the best gaming PCs on the market, with 8th-generation Intel Coffee Lake processors and Nvidia GTX 10-series graphics cards. With the Dell XPS Tower Special Edition,you're getting one of the best gaming PCs money can buy, without any of the off-putting 'gamer aesthetic'.

    Read the full review: Dell XPS Tower Special Edition 

  • This product is only available in the US and UK as of this writing. Australian readers: check out a fine alternative in the Corsair One.
  • a computer sitting on top of a table © Provided by Future Publishing Ltd.

    When you buy a computer from Origin, it's almost like you're building it on your own. You have to be familiar enough with PC components to decide for yourself what goes into the rig and how much money you're going to spend on it. So, of course, our only real criticism of the Origin Millennium is that you can build a similar model for cheaper. However, because of its subtle design and flexible specs, we're willing to bet you won't want to.

    Read the full review: Origin Millennium 

  • This product is only available in the US as of this writing. UK and Australian readers: check out a fine alternative in the Overclockers 8Pack Asteroid.
  • a desk with a laptop computer sitting on top of a chair © Provided by Future Publishing Ltd.

    In classic Alienware fashion, the Area 51 Threadripper Edition pushes the limits of both technology and your wallet. It's wildly powerful, markedly featuring the latest AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X across all of its configurations. The Area 51's triad-design hasn't changed much since its introduction back in 2014, but on the inside this machine is essentially tool-less to upgrade, not that you would even need to.

    Read the full review: Alienware Area 51 Threadripper Edition 

  • This product is only available in the US at the time of this writing. UK and Australian readers: check out a fine alternative in the Corsair One  
  • a screen shot of a video camera © Provided by Future Publishing Ltd.

    We knew that it was only a matter of time before the best gaming PCs started rolling out with the latest Coffee Lake Refresh and Nvidia Turing parts, and the MSI Trident X is here to lead the charge. This small-form factor PC pulls no punches, and will absolutely demolish any game you throw at it, at any resolution. Just keep in mind that the thin metal build might be a bit flimsy for travel, and its price tag is kind of steep. But, if you're looking for no-holds-barred power that won't look out of place in your living room, you can't do much better.

    Read the full review: MSI Trident X

    Bill Thomas, Joe Osborne and Gabe Carey have also contributed to this article

    Check out our Linux vs Windows vs Mac - OS comparison video below.

    quarta-feira, 27 de março de 2019

    The Division 2 Graphics Comparison And Frame Rate Test – PS4 Pro vs Xbox One X vs PC

    One of 2019's most anticipated shooter, The Division 2 is finally here. Not only is it an excellent looking game, it also manages to be one of the best, if not the best, looter shooters out there. Featuring a ton of content spread across exceptional map design, The Division 2 is easily one of the standout games that we have played this year. But how does the game perform and runs on the PS4 Pro, Xbox One X and PC, and what kind of improvements have been implemented in the SnowDrop engine since the original Division? Before we move ahead, please keep in mind that The Division 2 features dynamic weather so a one is to one comparison across the three platforms was not possible in some cases. With that in mind, let's get started.

    On the console front, we analyzed the game's performance by taking some sample scenes from the game and running it through trdrop, an open source software. Note that this tool gives us a mere demonstration of the game's performance, because an exact 1:1 representation of performance can only be provided by the developers themselves since they have access to vast of array of tools and profilers. The Division 2 targets 30 frames per second on both the PS4 Pro and Xbox One X, and according to the tool, the game sticks to that target. Even by doing a manual observation, the game doesn't seem to be dropping any frames at all, except on the PS4 Pro where in a rare case the frame rate dropped to 29. But largely speaking, you can expect a solid 30 frames per second across the board on both consoles.

    On the resolution front, things are a bit interesting. Both consoles use temporal anti-aliasing which does an okay job to reduce the jaggies on both consoles (more on this later), but there seems to be a dynamic scaler in place. Xbox One X seems to hand out a native 3840 X 2160 resolution. We are not sure whether there are other scenes which render at a lower resolution but regardless, this is a big improvement over the dynamic 1080p resolution offered by the original Division on the base Xbox One. On the PS4 Pro, however, there is definitely dynamic scaling happening which renders the resolution up to 4K. As mentioned before, both consoles use TAA to smoothen out the edges of various objects in the game's world, however its implementation seems to be a bit of mixed bag. Object edges on both PS4 Pro and Xbox One X look off at times, specially on the former, thereby hurting image quality by a bit.

    Now let's take a look at how the PC version of The Division 2 performs. To begin with, our test PC includes a GTX 1080Ti, 16GB of GDDR4 memory and Ryzen 1700 CPU. The original Division featured one of the most comprehensive lists of graphical parameters and the trend continues in The Division 2. The PC version includes options such as frame rate limit, shadow quality, spot shadows, spot shadow resolution, resolution scale, sharpening, particle detail, volumetric effect, particle detail, volumetric fog, ambient occlusion, reflection quality, vegetation quality, sub surface scattering, anisotropic filtering, terrain quality and a few others. There are a couple of things we wanted to point as far as settings goes. First of all, the game implements DX12 and it does a fantastic job of improving overall performance and lastly, the resolution scaling is only limited to 100%, so you can't scale it to something like 200%. On the performance front, we had absolutely no problem at all ru nning at 60 frames per second. This is a solid PC port by the developers with amazing overall graphical quality and a rock solid performance.

    The Division 2 Dark Zone

    The difference between consoles and PC is simply put remarkable at times. First of all, there seems to be some sort of a memory issue with regards to streaming assets within the SnowDrop engine. Certain objects, textures and even NPCs won't load for a few seconds. The worst offender is the PS4 Pro version wherein the pop in issue is absolutely terrible at times. The Xbox One X does a better job at asset streaming but it too struggles with object loading during some instances. Our test PC on the other hand had extremely limited streaming issue but pop in can still be observed if you look closely. This issue is clearly related to the amount of memory each hardware has. The PS4 Pro is the worst in this regard since it has only 8GB, followed by 12GB in Xbox One X and finally our PC which has 16GB.  The level of detail and shadow quality are much higher on the PC compared to the PS4 Pro and Xbox One X. Furthermore, the PC version also benefits from higher quality screen space reflec tions.

    With the comparisons out of the way, we wanted to talk a bit about the SnowDrop engine and the improvements the developers have implemented, if any, since The Division came out in 2016. Back in 2013, Ubisoft released a video showcasing the potential of the SnowDrop. It was clearly a look into the future of video game graphics with a high end showcase of dynamic material shaders, volumetric effects and weather effects. Unfortunately, very few of those effects got translated into the original Division. Even with The Division 2 these kinds of effects are still largely absent but what we have is a set of subtle changes and improvements that fans of the series will appreciate.

    The very first thing you will notice is the drastic change in environment textures. Environmental assets like buildings and objects feature higher texture quality compared to The Division, The Division was set in the winter season, so snowfall was a common appearance in the game. This has been replaced by a more vivid and colorful environment full of foliage and a bit of animal life. There also seems to be an uptick in the amount of detail across the environment with tons of debris scattered around. This helps in creating a depressing look and feel, an important element for a post-apocalyptic game like The Division 2.

    the division 2

    The lighting was already a strong point for SnowDrop and it seems that next to no changes have made in this department. As known already, The Division 2 is mostly set in the summer compared to the original's winter season, so material shaders of various assets such grass and tress result into vibrant physical lighting. The lighting effect in both games look superb and it seems like it will be a matter of preference for players. Next up is the Snowdrop engine's capability to render dynamic weather. Both games feature aggressive weather changes so be it a drizzle, thunder storm, sunny weather, The Division 2 manages to handle it as good as the original. And lastly, the terrain now features material shaders and parallax occlusion resulting into depth effects and reflection properties for mud surfaces. In comparison, the terrain in the original Division was slightly flat in nature due to it setting.

    In conclusion, the developers have implemented subtle improvements in the SnowDrop engine, however the animation and streaming issues could be distracting for console owners. In terms of which platforms plays The Division 2 best, it's clearly the PC build that takes the lead here with a massive margin. Between the consoles, the Xbox One X and PS4 Pro version are largely similar, but the X's better resolution and the less severe pop in issue makes it stand out. But regardless of the platform you want tp play the game on, you can't go wrong with the game's performance and a solid adherence to its frame rate cap.

    Features of Assassins Creed 2 Action PC Games Free Downloads

    Assassins creed 2 is an action adventure pc games contains good story line and excellent gameplay. This post gives overall idea about the key features, minimum system requirements and free download link of the assassins creed ii video games.

    Assassins Creed 2 : Intro

    Assassins creed 2 (AC2) is one of the best action-adventure pc video games which contains extreme, realistic combat skills orientated with nice storyline and gameplay. It is developed by Ubisoft Montreal and published by Ubisoft. Assassins Creed 2 is second part of assassins creed series (AC series) pc games which provides ultimate entertainment to gamers who loves action-adventure piece of games.

    As compared to assassins creed 1, AC 2 is having better graphics and starts with new assassin story "Ezio". AC 2 is supports Microsoft windows Vista, Windows XP, Windows 7 and Windows 8. This post contains the features, system requirements and assassins creed free download link.

    Assasssins Creed 2 Minimum System Requirements
  • Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo(1.8 GHz)/AMD Athlon X2 64 or higher
  • RAM: 1 GB or higher
  • Operating System: Windows XP/Vista/Windows 7/Mac OS X
  • Graphics Card: 256 MB NVIDIA or ATI graphics card required
  • Harddisk Space: 8 GB or higher
  • DirectX version: 9.0 c
  • Assassins Creed 2 Features Explained

    Assassin's creed ii is having third person perspective view gameplay in which you can see the player completely. The player can also view around by rotating mouse through 360 degree. AC 2 plot is set in 15th century Italy and player can roam around old Italy because of the open world map setting feature.

    In this pc games, the Animus version is upgraded from Animus 1.0 to Animus 2.0 machine through which Desomond Miles (the protagonist) access the Italian assassin "Ezio's" memory. The health of Ezio or player is synchronized with Animus 2.0 machine. While combat, if you hurt, you will loses the each bar of synchronization and automatically regenerates if you get some rest between fight. Better ran away from the enemy in such situations.

    Ezio is also helped by Italian scholar Da Vinci, who helps to modify the assassins hidden blades, parachutes, flying machine, hidden gun etc. The scholar needs codex pages and while traveling you has to collect codex pages from each place and it is part of mission also. The combat skills and weapons are upgraded as compared with Assassins creed 1 pc games.

    Poised blade, dual hidden blade, miniature fire arms are some of the upgrade version created by Da vinci by the help of codex pages. The player and jump into water and swim through it, which also an additional item of AC 2 features. On www.oceanofgames.com you will find Another cool feature of Assassins creed ii is that graphics quality which gives better detailed view of old Italian building and landscapes.

    Overall

    Assassin's creed 2 is one of the best pc games in action-adventure video games genre. It is having better storyline with great gameplay which is continuous entertain gamers at the end of the game story. The advanced combat skills and new weapons are also nice features in addition swimming too.

    domingo, 24 de março de 2019

    How to boost your PC game graphics with Nvidia Control Panel

    When you install the drivers for an Nvidia GPU, they come packed with a couple of weighty pieces of software - Nvidia GeForce Experience and Nvidia Control Panel. At a glance, GeForce Experience jumps out at you more with its bold interface and options to auto-optimise your games. But it's the non-descript Nvidia Control Panel - which wouldn't look out of place in Windows XP - that really lets you fine-tune your in-game graphics.

    We'll be taking a look at the 3D Settings section of Nvidia Control Panel, sifting through its glut of graphical tweaks to pick out the ones most capable of making your games shine.

    Read more: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

    The Basics

    To get started, open Nvidia Control Panel, then under 3D Settings in the navigation pane select 'Adjust image settings with preview'. In the preview pane that opens, select 'Use the advanced 3D image settings'. This will allow any changes you make to take effect.

    Next, go to 'Manage 3D settings' in the left-hand pane to open the 3D Settings box. This is where you'll be making your graphical tweaks.

    Most of the settings under 'Global Settings' are best left at they are. Shader cache, for example is best left on as it stores a game's shaders on your hard drive, precompiling them and giving a small boost to loading times and performance (particularly in open-world games).

    You may also be tempted to crank 'Power management mode' up to 'maximum performance', but this will make your GPU run loud and hot at its max clock speeds when gaming. It's overkill, and bad for the longevity of your card. 'Optimal power' is a good balance between performance and power.

    Many of the 3D settings in NVCP just don't work universally enough or have a tangible enough impact to recommend. So if we don't mention a particular option, just stick with its default settings.

    Anisotropic Filtering (AF)

    In first- and third-person games, you spend a lot of time looking at walls and floors at oblique angles, with the given surface stretching off into the distance. 

    The less texture filtering you have, the shorter the distance at which textures become blurred. It's a bit like being short-sighted, but specifically for surfaces at angles. 

    This is ostensibly done to improve performance, but these days your average GPU should be able to handle 16x anisotropic filtering with little trade-off.

    Look at the path in these two shots from The Witcher 3. With AF switched off, it's just a few feet before the path's textures become murky (marked by the red line). With 16x AF, it retains its nice crunchy texture much further into the distance.

    Image 1 of 2

    Image 2 of 2

    Looking at the list of NVCP's 3D settings, you might also spot 'Texture filtering - Anisotropic Sample Optimization', which can improve performance when you have AF switched on at a small cost in filtering quality. Only use this if you believe that AF is having a negative impact on game performance.

    NVCP's anisotropic filtering can work better than in-game AF settings, but this isn't guaranteed, and other times it's of identical quality (The Witcher 3 and F.E.A.R being cases in point). So it's best to compare the NVCP with in-game AF methods (if there are any), and decide for yourself which works best.

    DSR

    DSR, or Dynamic Super Resolution, is one of the most ingenious tricks added to Nvidia's Control Panel in recent years. By ticking the boxes in 'DSR - Factors', you unlock higher resolutions for your games (so 1.75x and 4x on a 1080p display will unlock 1440p and 4k resolutions respectively). 

    Enable DSR - Factors under 'Global Settings', then go to your in-game resolution menu and you'll see the higher resolutions listed. 

    DSR renders the game at a higher resolution than your monitor's native resolution, then squeezes it back down to fit you monitor, resulting in far fewer jagged edges and clearer textures. The catch is that DSR is just as strenuous on your GPU as if you were actually running that higher resolution, so expect big performance hits in more demanding games.

    However, if you have a game that's running at silky framerates on top settings - if you've got performance to spare, in other words - then it's worth a go. It works for older games that don't officially support anti-aliasing too, but beware of UIs in these games becoming extremely small at higher DSR factors. 

    Image 1 of 2

    Image 2 of 2

    These two images above from Dishonored 2 show a clear difference in texture fidelity on a 1080p display between no DSR and 4x DSR (4k, in other words). Everything in the image - from the painting of the gorilla to the flower in front - pops much more. The performance hit in this case was considerable however, knocking down the framerate from 75 to 30.

    The 'DSR - Smoothness' option affects how much blur is applied to the image, offsetting any artifacting that may occur as a result of the forcefully downsampled resolution. We leave this at the default 33% in Global Settings, but you can tweak it on a by-game basis - lower will roughen edges, higher will blur the image.

    Antialiasing (AA)

    There are so many antialiasing options in the 3D Settings list that they can be overwhelming. Do they all work for all games? Can you switch them all on at the same time to turn your games into a veritable hotpot of velvety antialiasing? 

    The answer is 'no', on both counts. The compatibility of these AA options varies greatly from game to game, so to an extent it's a case of just trying them out for yourself. We can help you get started though.

    Antialiasing - FXAA: Provides a layer of smoothing over the the top of other AA methods, reducing the visibility of jaggies at the cost of blurring. Low performance impact. 

    It rarely works in modern games, but can look good in older games, particularly when combined with DSR. Some people complain that FXAA blurs the image too much, so it's best switched on on a by-game basis. 

    Image 1 of 3

    With no DSR or FXAA, Civ 4's ageing graphics look jagged and shifting all over. The string of the bow is barely visible. 

    Image 2 of 3

    With 4x DSR, the jaggies are greatly reduced. Note also how the texture on the road is much clearer. 

    Image 3 of 3

    Add some FXAA, and the jaggies are all but gone. Look closely enough, and you you can just about see the entire string of the archer's bow too. Impressive. 

    Antialiasing - Gamma correction: Largely outdated. Helps thin objects blend against contrasting backgrounds. Only affects older games with MSAA and CSAA. No harm in leaving it on on the off-chance it may help.

    Antialiasing - Mode/Setting: Best left off in almost all circumstances. If a game has its own antialiasing options, then they will definitely do a better job than those in NVCP. You can try the 'Enhance application setting' option, but don't expect miracles. The only time it's worth trying to 'Override' application settings is when a game lacks its own AA options. Even then, these options aren't guaranteed to work. The most universal form of antialiasing is DSR, so you're better off experimenting with that than this.

    Antialiasing - Transparency: Smooths out edges on so-called alpha textures - textures with transparency effects like wire fences and masses of leaves on trees. Apply only to games where you have performance to spare (it's unlikely to work with most modern games anyway).

    In the images from FEAR below, you can see how AA transparency smooths out the jarring pixelation on the fence. What you don't see in the images is that without transparency those pixels on the fence shift and shimmer obscenely. With transparency, the fence becomes nice and static. For older games, this effect is well worth switching on.

    Image 1 of 2

    Image 2 of 2

    Multi-Frame Sampled AA (MFAA): A relatively recent effect for DX10 and more recent games. MFAA works over the top of MSAA (multisample antialiasing), improving its effects with little impact on performance.

    The rough equation is that if you have 2x MSAA enabled, MFAA increases it to 4x, if you have 4x MSAA enabled, MFAA boosts it to 8x, and so on. It doesn't work with all games, but you should keep it on in Global Settings as it might get your game a free graphical boost.

    The best graphics card for 2019

    When it comes to building your dream gaming PC, figuring out the best graphics card for your needs, wants, and budget is often the most difficult part. Every gamer might love to have an $1,199 (£1,099, AU$1,899) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, the fastest consumer card right now, but your wallet should have the final say. Excellent performance at high resolutions is only one factor to consider, and you can easily game on much more affordable hardware. The best graphics cards come in variety of shapes and sizes, and we're here to help you find the perfect GPU, no matter what kind of games you want to play, or what your budget looks like.

    If you're trying to play titles like Metro Exodus in 4K at 60fps, you're going to need an expensive GPU like the RTX 2080 Ti. But, if you're just trying to play some Overwatch or World of Warcraft with some friends, you can get by with something like the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, or AMD Radeon RX 590, which are a fraction of the price. No matter what you're trying to do, there's a graphics card out there for you. 

    Right now, if you're looking to balance budget vs performance and future-proofing, we'd probably recommend the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070. While it isn't the most powerful card, it matches or exceed the performance of the previous generation GTX 1080, at a slightly lower price, and it supports all the ray tracing and DLSS effects for when those become prevalent. The EVGA Black RTX 2070 is one of our favorite options, but keep an eye out for deals as we've seen other RTX 2070 cards drop as low as $450.

    It all comes down to personal choice and budget, so below you'll find the best graphics cards at their cheapest prices we could find, along with some notes on their performance and features. And here are some links to other features you'll find useful if you're building a complete PC instead of just upgrading your graphics card.

    Best CPU for gaming | Best DDR4 RAM | Best gaming motherboardsBest SSD for gaming | Best PC cases | Best gaming monitors

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

    The fastest graphics card for 4K, ray tracing, and everything else

    GPU Cores: 4,352 | Base Clock: 1,350MHz | Boost Clock: 1,545MHz | GFLOPS: 13,448 | Memory: 11GB GDDR6 | Memory Clock: 14 GT/s | Memory Bandwidth: 616GB/s

    Fastest graphics card around

    Ray tracing and deep learning tech

    TItan pricing on GeForce

    No ray traced games yet

    Nvidia's GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is the latest and most potent GPU around, and it's also one of the largest consumer GPUs ever produced. The Turing TU102 is 60 percent larger than the Pascal GP102 in the 1080 Ti, with 55 percent more transistors. Those extra transistors went into more CUDA cores, but Nvidia didn't stop there, adding in Tensor cores to help accelerate deep learning algorithms like DLSS, plus RT cores to accelerate ray tracing. There are plenty of other enhancements in the Turing architecture as well, but if you want the best, be prepared to shell out: the cheapest 2080 Ti cards start at $999, with many selling for $1,199 and up.

    If you're looking for the best value, forget about the new RTX cards. On the other hand, if you're eying a 4k 144Hz HDR G-Sync display and you want the absolute fastest graphics card around, this is the card for you. You could even try adding a second card and using an NVLink connector, assuming you just won the lottery. We're unlikely to see anything substantially faster for at least a year, so you'll be able to sit comfortably at the top of the pecking order for a while.

    Second fastest GPU at a more reasonable price

    GPU Cores: 2,944 | Base Clock: 1,515MHz | Boost Clock: 1,710MHz | GFLOPS: 10,068 | Memory: 8GB GDDR6 | Memory Clock: 14 GT/s | Memory Bandwidth: 448GB/s

    Ray tracing and deep learning

    Potential to become even faster

    1440p ray tracing needs DLSS

    More expensive than the 1080 Ti

    Sure, the RTX 2080 Ti is the fastest graphics card and has all sorts of cool and potentially useful features, but at the current prices it's a tough pill to swallow. Dropping down to the RTX 2080 will get you still excellent performance—it's the second fastest consumer GPU, edging out the GTX 1080 Ti—and save over $300. And you still get the same ray tracing and deep learning (eg, DLSS) features, albeit not quite as many of each core type.

    The one major caveat right now is the same as above, we're still waiting for games that enable ray tracing effects and DLSS. Those should start arriving in the next month or so with a Shadow of the Tomb Raider patch and Battlefield 5, but will the RTX 2080 be powerful enough to use the new features? Most likely not at maximum resolution and quality, but hopefully we'll be able to run at a reduced quality ray tracing mode that will look nearly as good and perform better.

    The fastest AMD graphics card, the first 7nm GPU, and an excellent choice for content creation

    GPU Cores: 3,840 | Base Clock: 1,400MHz | Boost Clock: 1,750MHz | GFLOPS: 13,440 | Memory: 16GB HBM2 | Memory Clock: 2 GT/s | Memory Bandwidth: 1024GB/s

    Good performance

    Support the underdog

    Slower than GTX 1080 Ti

    No truly new features

    The Radeon VII is an excellent GPU for content creation duties with gaming as side job. That's thanks to its massive 16GB of HBM2 and 1TB/s of memory bandwidth. It's also the world's first 7nm GPU, which is how AMD reduced the size compared to Vega 64 while boosting performance.

    If you want the fastest graphics card that $700 can buy, you're generally better off with the RTX 2080. It outperforms the Radeon VII by around 10 percent on average, and it does that while drawing less power. However, there's something to be said for supporting AMD as an alternative to Nvidia, and some gamers will take that route. 

    Supply of the Radeon VII hasn't kept up with demand, at least not yet, but we expect that to change. We also expect to see some custom designs from AMD's AIB partners at some point, but right now all the Radeon VII cards use the same reference design. It's a great design, though, with triple fans and a stylish enclosure. If you're pulling for Team Red, this is currently as good as it gets.

    Fast and more affordable than the other RTX models

    GPU Cores: 2,304 | Base Clock: 1,410MHz | Boost Clock: 1,620MHz | GFLOPS: 7,465 | Memory: 8GB GDDR6 | Memory Clock: 14 GT/s | Memory Bandwidth: 448GB/s

    Good performance

    Better pricing than other models

    Not much faster than GTX 1080

    Waiting for DLSS games

    The ray tracing future may sound great, but what if you can't afford $700 or more on a graphics card? That's where Nvidia's RTX 2070 enters the picture, the third Turing GPU and the most affordable of the bunch. More importantly, it's relatively widely available, and there are even a few cards at the base recommended price of $500. That's still a lot of money for a graphics card, and the 2070 is actually slower than the previous generation 1080 Ti (see below), at least in games that don't support DLSS—which is everything for the time being, though that should start to change soon.

    The RTX 2070 effectively takes over where the GTX 1080 left off. It offers slightly better performance for the same price, and like the other RTX cards it features the new Tensor and RT cores. The Founders Edition wasn't particularly impressive, given its $100 price premium, but we liked the EVGA 2070 Black quite a bit and it makes for a fine addition to any new gaming PC. The Gigabyte 2070 Windforce and Asus 2070 Turbo are two more options to consider, and all the 2070 GPUs tend to reach similar maximum overclocks.

    Perfect for 1440p and 144Hz displays

    GPU Cores: 1,920 | Base Clock: 1,410MHz | Boost Clock: 1,680MHz | GFLOPS: 6,451 | Memory: 6GB GDDR6 | Memory Clock: 14 GT/s | Memory Bandwidth: 336GB/s

    Great for 1080p and 1440p gaming

    Affordably priced RTX features

    Struggles in ray tracing games

    Sideways step from GTX 1070 Ti

    The best graphics card isn't simply the fastest graphics card, or the cheapest graphics card. Instead, the best graphics card needs to balance performance, price, and features. There are many great graphics cards, but for a great GPU that won't break the bank, Nvidia's RTX 2060 is probably the best option. It delivers performance roughly equal to the outgoing GTX 1070 Ti, with a lower price, plus all the new RTX features.

    If you want to play games at 1080p or 1440p on a 144Hz display, the RTX 2060 has the chops to handle most games at close to high to ultra quality. Unless you enabled ray tracing in games that support it, at which point it tends to come up short. Still, with a retail price of $350, it's hard not to like the RTX 2060. About the only thing threatening its price/performance ratio is the rumored GTX 1660 Ti.

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB

    Powerful and packing HBM2, the Vega 56 now has a mainstream price

    GPU Cores: 3,584 | Base Clock: 1,156MHz | Boost Clock: 1,471MHz | GFLOPS: 10,554 | Memory: 8GB HBM2 | Memory Clock: 1.6 GT/s | Memory Bandwidth: 410GB/s

    Great performance

    Suitable for 1440p

    Can be quite power hungry

    Architecture showing its age

    We had high hopes for Vega prior to its launch, and ultimately it couldn't live up to the hype. Instead of being the Titan-killer we hoped for, the Vega 64 and Vega 56 failed to take down even Nvidia's year-old GTX 1080 / 1070. But they come close, often leading in DirectX 12 games, and at least prices are affordable these days. Plus you can make the argument of supporting the underdog to prevent an Nvidia monopoly.

    The RX Vega 56 is the better buy at current prices, and it will usually handle modern games at 1440p and maybe even 4k. Where it comes up short is in efficiency: the Vega 56 often uses as much power as a GTX 1080 Ti, with performance closer to the new RTX 2060. It's not just about power and heat, but noise levels and longevity. More power on the GPU means more power on the PSU, which means both have fans that need to spin faster. We really want an RTX competitor from AMD, but unfortunately the Radeon VII isn't it. Until AMD's Navi ships in late 2019, the Vega 56 remains a good upper midrange value.

    The best card for mainstream gaming right now

    GPU Cores: 1,536 | Base Clock: 1,500MHz | Boost Clock: 1,770MHz | GFLOPS: 5,437 | Memory: 6GB GDDR6 | Memory Clock: 12 GT/s | Memory Bandwidth: 288GB/s

    Excellent performance at 1080p

    Very efficient design

    Only 6GB VRAM

    No RTX features

    Nvidia's latest GPU is the GTX 1660 Ti, sort of an odd departure for the new Turing architecture as Nvidia removed (or at least disabled) the ray tracing and deep learning hardware that has so far been the focus of a lot of hype, not to mention a little controversy. But along with dropping those features Nvidia delivers a lower priced and impressively efficient design. It mostly takes over from the previous GTX 1060 cards, with more bandwidth and better performance at a similar price. In fact, it's almost a direct replacement in performance for the GTX 1070.

    There are a few minor drawbacks, however, like sticking with 6GB of VRAM. Yes, the GDDR6 memory delivers 50 percent more bandwidth than the 1060 6GB GDDR5, but some newer games are starting to push beyond 6GB at some settings. There's also the missing RTX features. Ray tracing and DLSS might not seem like such a big deal right now, but $70 more gets you the faster and potentially more capable RTX 2060. But if you don't want to go about $300, the GTX 1660 Ti is a great graphics card.

    A powerful and impressively priced mainstream card

    GPU Cores: 2,304 | Base Clock: 1,257MHz | Boost Clock: 1,340MHz | GFLOPS: 6,175 | Memory: 8GB GDDR5 | Memory Clock: 8 GT/s | Memory Bandwidth: 256GB/s

    Excellent performance at 1080p

    Usually faster in DX12 games

    Uses more power than GTX 1060

    Many gamers are on a budget, and while faster cards might make you envious, if you're running a 1080p display they're often overkill. Mainstream GPUs like the RX 570/580 and GTX 1060 3GB/6GB are close to the original MSRPs, with sales even dropping below MSRP. The RX 580 8GB trades blows with the GTX 1060 6GB, typically winning by a few percent in performance but using more power. The overall victor of the midrange category is largely determined by local pricing, with the US market currently favoring the RX 580.

    You can find the RX 580 8GB for less than $200, hitting the sweet spot for mainstream gamers. That undercuts both GTX 1060 models as well as AMD's own RX 590. The 590 is about 10-15 percent faster but costs 40 percent more. Until the RX 590 prices drop or we see a better mainstream successor, the 580 8GB remains one of the best values in graphics cards.

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

    Great 1080p performance and a new, lower price (for now)

    GPU Cores: 1,280 | Base Clock: 1,506MHz | Boost Clock: 1,708MHz | GFLOPS: 4,372 | Memory: 6GB GDDR5 | Memory Clock: 8 GT/s | Memory Bandwidth: 192GB/s

    Good price and performance

    Efficient and quiet

    Lower settings in demanding games

    Rumors of GTX 1660 Ti

    Nvidia's older GTX 1060 cards are an alternative to the RX 580/570, though with the arrival of the GTX 1660 Ti above we expect supply of the 10-series cards to dry up. For now, however, the price has dropped and the 1060 6GB still delivers good performance. The loss of 2GB VRAM relative to the RX 580 isn't really a concern in most games, especially at 1080p, which is where these cards do best. 1440p is possible, but only at sometimes significantly lower quality settings.

    The biggest benefit of the GTX 1060 is that is uses about 50W less power than the RX 580. That's less heat and a quieter build, though power savings will likely only add up to a dollar or two per month (unless you game a whole lot). If you don't want the RX 580 or GTX 1660 Ti, this is a great card at close to $200. There will probably be a $200 GTX 1660 non-Ti card to replace this in the not too distant future.

    Another great 1080p card, at a bargain price

    GPU Cores: 2,048 | Base Clock: 1,168MHz | Boost Clock: 1,244MHz | GFLOPS: 5,095 | Memory: 4GB GDDR5 | Memory Clock: 7 GT/s | Memory Bandwidth: 224GB/s

    Good for 1080p gaming

    Often faster in DX12

    Uses more power than GTX 1060

    Only 4GB VRAM

    AMD's Polaris architecture version two is in the Radeon RX 570/580. The RX 570 4GB has now dropped well below its original $169 target, and if you're looking for a 1080p card you really won't find a better bargain. Overall, the RX 570 4GB typically comes out slightly ahead of the GTX 1060 3GB, and while it does use a bit more power, it also costs $35 less than the cheapest 1060. Most desktops are more than capable of running this 150W card without any difficulty, and it pretty much kills off the market for anything lower.

    The biggest concern with the RX 570 is that it's getting old, and if you opt for the cheaper 4GB model, future games could present a problem. Then again, running future games at ultra quality probably isn't viable regardless. For lighter fare like Overwatch or CSGO, this is more than enough GPU and should keep you happily gaming for several years.

    An affordable card that's great for esports

    GPU Cores: 1,024 | Base Clock: 1,175MHz | Boost Clock: 1,275MHz | GFLOPS: 2,611 | Memory: 2GB GDDR5 | Memory Clock: 7 GT/s | Memory Bandwidth: 112GB/s

    Extremely affordable

    No power adapter required

    Struggles with some newer games

    When it comes to budget graphics cards, the primary competitors are AMD's RX 560 and Nvidia's GTX 1050. Currently, the RX 560 4GB costs less than the GTX 1050 2GB 1050 and typically performs slightly better, especially at low to medium quality and 1080p where competitive gamers like to hang out. That makes it the easy choice for the budget category, though the RX 570 mentioned above is much faster for just $30 more.

    If you really can't afford much more than $100, the RX 560 4GB is great for lighter esports games, including CS:GO, LoL, Overwatch, and more. It can easily hit 60fps at 1080p in most games at low to high quality (depending on the game), which is about as much as we can ask of such a card. Just know that the RX 560 is at the very bottom of what we consider 'acceptable' performance and is likely to struggle in the new crop of demanding games (eg, Metro Exodus).

    While the CPU is still the 'brain' of your PC, dozens of games every year will push your graphics card to its limits. It's the component you'll want to upgrade most frequently, but if you buy the right card, it should last you at least two years. For gaming systems, it's also likely the most expensive part in your build. On a practical budget, it's critical to find the graphics card with the best ratio of price to performance. That's why we've previously looked at cards in the $300/£250 range, though the best values are currently either above or below that mark.

    Recent graphics card reviews

    For raw performance, Nvidia's RTX 2080 Ti is a killer card, easily outperforming all older cards. It's also modestly overclockable, quiet, and reasonably efficient. But it costs an arm and a leg. You can argue about whether you really need ultra quality or what resolution to run, but your wallet will likely end up pointing you at cards in the $200-$350 range. That's why the RTX 2060 is such an impressive card, even if it's not the fastest new kid on the block.

    We recommend the RTX 2060, or maybe the RTX 2070, to most—but not all—PC gamers, it's not the only option worth considering. Performance scales with price as you move up the ladder, but near the top you get greatly diminishing returns. The same goes for moving down to the ladder, though: go too low and while the price might look good, performance could leave you wanting. So we factor in all of these elements when reviewing and recommending graphics cards.

    Do you need a new graphics card?

    If you're doubtful that your current PC is fast enough to warrant purchasing a better graphics card, I have some data for you. Even with the fastest graphics card around, running at a resolution that puts more of the burden on your CPU (1080p ultra), there's often only a minor improvement in gaming performance. Yes, truly old CPUs are going to struggle, but going from a Core i7-4770K to a Core i7-8700K only improves gaming performance by 23 percent on average.

    What happens if you use a graphics card that's 20-30 percent slower than a GTX 1080 Ti? Your CPU becomes even less of a factor. If you have at least 8GB of system memory and a Core i7-4770K or better CPU, you should be fine with everything up to about the GTX 1070 Ti / RX Vega 56 level of performance. We wouldn't recommend buying an i7-4770K these days, however, so when it comes time to upgrade look at our choice for the best CPU for gaming.

    Don't be fooled into thinking VRAM capacity is more important than the GPU, either. It can be a factor, but slower GPUs with 4GB VRAM usually can't handle settings that actually need 4GB VRAM, and games that need 8GB will also tend to favor GPUs closer to the RTX 2080 than the RX 580. There's also very little (if any) discernible difference in most games when switching from 2GB to 4GB textures, never mind 4GB to 8GB. All the cards we've selected have at least 4GB, which is more than sufficient for high quality, and it's usually enough for ultra settings as well. 

    Testing graphics cards

    Our graphics card recommendations are based on our own extensive benchmarks and testing, and then factoring in the price. We have benchmark data for the complete range of Nvidia and AMD graphics cards, including all the RTX 20-series, GTX 10-series and AMD Radeon VII, RX Vega, and RX 500 series. We've previously looked at the R9 Fury/300/200 series and GTX 900/700 series, but due to time constraints and availability we're no longer actively testing most of these cards. However, I've included one or two representatives from each generation as a point of reference.

    A word about SLI and CrossFire

    If you're looking for maximum performance, you can run two cards in SLI or CrossFire. However, it's becoming increasingly common for major games to completely ignore multi-GPU users. You don't absolutely need dual x16 connections, though it can boost performance by a few percent in some games. Also of note is that our tests indicate AMD's Ryzen parts don't scale in SLI/CF performance nearly as well as Intel's Core processors.

    Graphics performance isn't the only consideration. The quality of game drivers and other features supported by the card are important. The card's noise level, power draw, and temperature matter, too. Thankfully, nearly all modern cards are fairly quiet, even under load, and temperatures are within the acceptable range as well, though Nvidia still has an advantage when it comes to power.

    We test each card on a high-end PC at 1080p medium, 1080p ultra, 1440p ultra, and 4K with ultra/high settings. We take the results from fifteen games, mostly newer releases, using the 'best' API for each GPU on each game. That means low-level APIs are used for AMD cards if they're available, while DX12/Vulkan are only used in certain games for Nvidia cards.

    Here's how the cards stack up in terms of average and minimum frame rates across these games. You can see individual game charts including most of these GPUs in our GTX 1660 Ti review.

    [Performance charts updated as of February 25, 2019]

    Image 1 of 4

    Swipe left/right for additional charts

    Image 2 of 4

    Swipe left/right for additional charts

    Image 3 of 4

    Swipe left/right for additional charts

    Image 4 of 4

    Swipe left/right for additional charts

    Nvidia claims most of the top spots for performance, with the new Radeon VII coming in below the RTX 2080 RTX 2080 and GTX 1080 Ti, but above the RTX 2070. That's how far behind AMD is, unfortunately: its latest $700 graphics card ends up being a hair slower than Nvidia's 2-year-old $700 card. That's probably also a big part of why the RTX cards cost so much more than their 'equivalent' 10-series counterparts.

    But you don't need to buy at the top of the chart to get good performance, as mainstream cards like the RX 570/580 and GTX 1060 3GB/6GB are still totally viable, and the GTX 970/980 and R9 Fury X/390 don't look too shabby either. They might not do so well at 1440p ultra, but they're more than capable of running most games at 1080p medium to high quality, sometimes more.

    But how do these cards compare in terms of value?

    [Prices for charts updated as of February 25, 2019]

    Image 1 of 3

    Swipe left/right for Euros/pounds

    Image 2 of 3

    Swipe left/right for dollars/Euros

    Image 3 of 3

    Swipe left/right for pounds/dollars

    Image 1 of 3

    Swipe left/right for Euros/pounds

    Image 2 of 3

    Swipe left/right for dollars/Euros

    Image 3 of 3

    Swipe left/right for pounds/dollars

    In terms of best value, we've provided two different looks at what the cards offer, both in frames per second per monetary unit. The top charts show the graphics cards in isolation, which can be useful if you have a PC and you're only looking to upgrade your GPU. The bottom charts look at framerates in terms of total system cost, using a decent  (i7-8700K) build as a reference point. Neither approach is a perfect, but the two give a range of how the cards rate in terms of value.

    The markets change the picture slightly, but the RX 570 / 580 and GTX 1660 Ti / 1060 3GB/6GB are consistently at the top of the GPU charts, with the more expensive GPUs like the Radeon VII and RTX 2080 Ti falling to the bottom. The problem is that while budget GPUs on their own may look pretty good, combine it with system price, especially on a powerful modern PC, and you're almost always better off putting more money into your graphics card.

    Notice that for our roughly $800 build (minus the GPU—the build is similar to our high-end gaming PC build guide but with less storage capacity), the more expensive cards are at the top. Also note that while we're still listing all the GTX 10-series parts, many of those are becoming increasingly difficult to buy, unless you resort to places like eBay. But whichever chart you look at, keep in mind the types of games you want to play as well as your monitor, because higher resolution displays tend to need more powerful GPUs.

    Wrapping it up

    Looking forward, computer graphics is a fast-changing field. AMD just released the first ever 7nm GPU, but it certainly won't be the last. Still, it may be a year or more before Nvidia joins the 7nm party. Our recommendations are based off performance combined with current prices, and price cuts or a limited time sale could easily move a card to the top of the list.

    If you find your current system isn't keeping up with the gaming times, look at the performance charts and decide how far up the ladder you're looking to climb, then buy accordingly. Those who already own an R9 390 or GTX 970 or better should still be able to run any current game, though not necessarily at 60 fps and maximum quality. Games continue to push for new levels of performance, but tuning a few settings should keep most graphics cards viable for at least a few years.

    Some online stores give us a small cut if you buy something through one of our links. Read our affiliate policy for more info.

    sábado, 23 de março de 2019

    Student’s Birthday Present: $1200 Best Gaming PC Build

    gaming-pcHello everyone, I am the author from papercheap.co.uk and my son who is a college student celebrated his 20th birthday last week. This date was very important for him, so I decided to make a present: to build a gaming PC of his dream.

    His old gaming PC was bought back in 2014. It was a budget system powerful enough to play 2013-2014 titles in 1080p resolution on medium-to-high graphic settings. But it had a low-end dual-core processor and a mid-range GPU, so the performance wasn’t the best even at the moment I bought it.

    So, the gaming PC you’ll see below in this article was assembled while taking into account the 1080p monitor we already owned. Notice that we spent the budget of 1200 bucks only to get the PC itself. I do not include the cost of peripherals (keyboard, mouse, headset, etc.) and a licensed OS into the price list.

    By the way, did you know gaming is a perfect topic for essay writing? If you need to make some writing on any topic for a high school, college or university, but feel that you don’t have enough time or motivation, just visit the website I linked above and say “write my essay for me”. There you can solve all your problems with writing.

    Now, before I tell about our gaming PC, I would like to remark one thing: we did not aim to build the most cost-effective rig as our wallet allowed choosing from a wide range of hardware components. I know that some parts are kind of “overkill” gear and it was possible to replace them with cheaper alternatives in this particular system, and so on. But this was my and my son’s choice, and I’ll try to explain reasons why we decided to pick these exact parts without saving/adding money on them.

    Okay, let’s roll.

    CPU in the PC Gaming Rig and More

    We built our previous computer on the Intel Core i3 processor, so the “blue” CPU was the first candidate to become the heart of the new system, too. It was the Core i5-8400, but the final choice was different. I looked at the AMD Ryzen platform after my son decided to try himself in computer graphics and video montage in addition to regular gaming. CG rendering and content creation software is optimized to utilize CPU cores and threads more effectively than most of modern games, so we chose the 6-core 12-thread processor â€" AMD Ryzen 5 2600.

    The additional advantage of this CPU was the price. Despite having two times as many threads as the Core i5-8400, the Ryzen 5 2600 had its const lower: $170 against $200. We evaluated this choice during a plenty of time, and knew that we sacrifice some gaming performance to get huge profits in rendering. In my opinion, the decision was worth it. AMD Ryzen 2600 made our system not only the optimal price-to-performance choice in PC gaming, but turned it into a universal rig possible to use it in many different purposes without losing in comfort and speed.

    Why didn’t we add 25 dollars to get the 2600X then? Well, comparing 2 versions of this Ryzen CPU, the overclocked X-version would provide us with additional 200 MHz of frequency (3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). I think that 6% of additional performance is not worth 15% of a price, especially if to take into account the cooler and the motherboard we chose aiming to overclock our usual Ryzen 5 2600.

    And the last “pro” argument was the AM4 platform itself. The s1151v2 socket offered by Intel will not get new CPUs in future: the hot and pricy 9900K is the most advanced solution in our days, but Intel doesn’t plan to give users future generations of processors fitting to the same socket.

    AMD AM4 will definitely get one more upgrade this summer. Yes, there will be just refreshed Zen CPUs, but there are rumors about additional cores and threads coming with higher frequencies. In any case, this socket is good enough today and has big upgrade perspectives in future.

    CPU Cooler in a Gaming PC

    gaming-cpu-fans

    We chose the Dark Rock Pro 4 by “be quiet!” Let’s make it clear. Yes, I know it is an absolute overkill for the chosen CPU. I know it is not cost-effective in our case, and I know that we overpaid a decent sum of money to buy this cooler. But what matters in our case with a windowed gaming PC case: it looks great. Also, it is able to keep the overclocked Ryzen 5 [email protected] GHz cool, and its vent works very quietly. The only disadvantage I noticed: the cooler was a bit difficult to mount it to the AM4 CPU socket.

    The Best Gaming PC Motherboard

    Here we picked Asus Prime B450-Plus because of its B450 chipset and good enough VRM radiators (matter in CPU overclocking), 4 RAM slots (matter in the future upgrade of rendering abilities) and the M.2 interface support (matters in comfort properties). We didn’t go after the X470 chipset motherboard: there is no need to buy its advantages we aren’t going to use at home. The good B450 board was just fine.

    The standard ATX form-factor might be too large for someone, but it was OK to my son. Though he doesn’t plan using the second PCIe-x16 slot to build the 2-GPU subsystem, there is a sound card and a fast PCIe Wi-Fi module we transplanted from the old computer. Additionally, there is no space limitation in his room, so he just wanted to have a large and good-looking PC for gaming.

    The Optimal Gaming PC RAM Choice

    There never can be too much RAM in your PC. Still, we decided to set that dual-channel “good enough” option in our case and chose two 8 GB 3200 MHz Crucial Ballistix Sport AT modules. 16 gigabytes of RAM are fine in 2019, and our motherboard carries 2 additional slots to add some memory in future (the MB supports up to 64 GB). And I bet gamers know why we chose RAM modules with such high memory frequencies: AMD Ryzen CPUs can operate significantly better with fast RAM solutions.

    As a result, we’ve got it all at once: maximum RAM frequency backup to our R5 2600 possible with this motherboard, enough memory volume for now, and a future-proof upgrade option. Not a bad choice for 100 bucks.

    Building a Gaming PC: Storage Devices

    In our case, this point includes two options: a standard need in an average hard drive and a will to get the most comfort. To get the regular storage, we took the most common and popular 3.5” disc: the Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB HDD with 64 MB of cache and 7200 RPM. It is enough to store most games, movies, music, college projects, video footage and anything else.

    And the chosen SSD in our gaming PC might confuse most readers, because it is the Samsung 970 Evo M.2 drive with 500 GB capacity. Yes, we understood it costs 150 dollars when picking it. But it is the NVMe solid state drive by Samsung with the V-NAND memory. We found its cost as a payment to get the ultimate comfort, speed and durability it brings to the computer. If you like competitive games (Rainbow Six Siege, Overwatch, APEX Legends, etc.) then the speed of your physical memory will have a noticeable meaning in your online experience.

    In a few words, 970 Evo is worth the money paid to get it.

    The Gaming PC GPU Choice

    The GPU, or the video card, is the most expensive and critical part of the gaming PC build. To get enough 1080p performance and to have some high-end features and possibilities at a moderate price, we chose the 6 GB video card: MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Ventus. The top RTX solutions by NVidia (2070, 2080 and 2080Ti) are severely overpriced nowadays, while the 2060 option gives you the level of the past-gen 1070Ti despite of a smaller memory bank (due to the GDDR6 type used) and the entry-level access to the real-time ray tracing technology by NVidia.

    The RTX 2060 card is more than good in the gaming PC with the 1080p monitor.

    Those who don’t want to pay unnecessary costs to get access to RTX features but needs a high-end 1080p gaming solution can pick GTX 1660Ti. People who want to get the most balanced price-to-performance GPU can consider Radeon RX 580 or GTX 1070: these are past-generation cards but they are still capable of providing you with excellent gaming experience at above 60 frames per second in 1920×1080 display resolution.

    Picking the PSU

    We aimed to pick the reliable modular PSU into our gaming PC. The 550W SeaSonic Focus Plus Gold power supply unit suited our needs perfectly. It has the 80+ Gold certification, all the necessary kinds of protection and voltage stabilization, and is fully modular. Stock cables are all black and fit our color palette of the PC interior.

    As for me, this PSU will serve us a lot and move from one system to another for years.

    The Case to Build a Gaming PC

    The case is always a matter of one’s taste. As for me, the white NZXT H500 case picked by my son is too dull and minimalistic in terms of exterior design, but it suits him and his room interior perfectly, and what is more important: he likes it.

    The case is made of good materials (steel and tempered glass only), has nice cooling properties, two stock ventilators added by the manufacturer (though they’re a bit noisy and better to be replaced ASAP), perfect cable management options and has enough inner volume to carry the Dark Rock Pro 4 CPU cooler with no problem.

    There are many cheaper and more expensive gaming PC cases to consider according to your tastes, interior styles and budgets.

    Costs for Building a Gaming PC

    This is the price list of our best gaming PC ever built:

    Part Price CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $165 Cooler: be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 $85 Motherboard: Asus Prime B450-PLUS ATX $125 RAM: Crucial Ballistix Sport 2×8 GB DDR4-3200 $110 HDD: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5” 7200RPM $45 SSD: Samsung 970 Evo 500 GB M.2 NVMe $150 GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 2060 6GB Ventus OC $360 PSU: 550 W SeaSonic Focus Plus Gold $80 Case: NZXT H500 White ATX Mid Tower $75 In total: Best Gaming PC $1195